Veonco Review The Bad & Ugly Of This Trading Platform- Exposed

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

The Good, The Bad, The Ugly

A technical and fundamental review of trade plans uploaded for the week. The good refers to the winners, the bad refers to the losers and the ugly refers to stupid trade plans. The objective of this post is – what was the lesson and how can these mistakes be avoided in future.

Trade Plans for the Week
1. GBPCHF Short @ market SL @ 1.29359 TP @ 1.26077……………..Bad
2. AUDUSD Short 0.77842 SL @ 0.78600 TP @ 0.76569………………Ugly
3. USDZAR long @ 13.56207 SL @ 13.64761 TP @ 13.98165…………..Ugly
4. USDCAD Long @ WPP SL @ 1.24422 TP @ 1.26716…………………Bad
5. GBPJPY Short @ 148.163 SL @ 149.357 TP @ 146.00 or 144.631……Bad
6. WTI Long @ MPP SL @ 48.50 TP @ 55.50……………………….Good
7. EURUSD Short @ 1.18267 SL @ 1.18912 TP @ 1.7035……………..Bad
8. AUDUSD Long @ 0.78/ WPP SL 0.77457 TP 0.80500……………….Not triggered
9. CADJPY Long @ 90.00 SL @ 89.396 TP @ 94.00………………….Not triggered
10. EURJPY Long @ 133.000 SL @ 131.749 TP @ 137.00……………..Not triggered
11. GBPJPY Long @ 148.500 SL @ 147.701 TP @ 157.612…………….Bad

The pairs traded for the week were USD, GBP, JPY and WTI.

Technical and fundamental Review
Before looking at each trade plan, let’s first review the week technically and fundamentally for the week. We came into the week after NFP reported a negative number though an increase in wages and a lower unemployment number. On Monday during Asia we saw some news out of the UK regarding understated inflation (From the UK Times – says a mistake by the UK’s Office for National Statistics has led to domestic inflation being understated) this was reported during Asia on Monday indicating that the BOE would be likely to tighten at a future date. This news was received with Brexit talks underway, which has been the result of Pound weakness heading into this week. Later Monday we had ECB Lautenschläger commenting on ECB monetary policy saying that bond purchases will come to an end. All while Gold was making a move higher. Dollar weakness was then supported by FOMC meeting minutes that were less hawkish than expected.

The USD trades I posted were based on a continuation of the bullish trend in the USDollar and could have yielded some good results, however there a crucial tactic missing from the overall plan… Confirmation of Dollar strength and it literally came down to what did not take place within a six-hour window. This single mistake is the result of not just losing pips on the ugly USD trades but also missing out on the profit that could have been earned if I had not assumed that just because price is at support in a bullish trend it will go up and that the fundamentals causing Dollar strength the week before were still in play, at least for the time being. This is a very important lesson. If you can’t spot the pig then you’re it.

Taking the obvious fundamental data and the lack of confirmation of Dollar strength into account let’s now review each of the USD trade plans.

AUDUSD Short 0.77842 SL @ 0.78600 TP @ 0.76569
I have put this trade into the ugly category because the double bottom at WM2 should have been a clear indication that there was not any reason to sell this pair at WPP – even if the 21 was below the 55 and price had made a lower low. We can see Bears sold at this resistance level, though the lack of Dollar strength as indicated in the Dollar Index meant there was no setup and so, therefore, no reason to sell. Add to this the higher highs and higher lows on Gold M15 and one has a clear reason to be bullish on the Aussie.

USDZAR long @ 13.56207 SL @ 13.64761 TP @ 13.98165
In addition to the Dollar weakness and Gold strength, we also had a rally in Platinum (South Africa is the number one Platinum producer in the world) and the SCA issue regarding the spy tapes for Zuma. All making for a potentially strong Rand. Technically price had made a higher high and was at support in a bullish trend though once again, a strategy without tactics is like driving a car without a destination in mind. The setup on M15 was clearly bearish and with price being above WPP there should have been no reason to buy this pair – even if it was bullish. This trade plan goes into the ugly category due to fundamentals not being taken into account and due to there being no bullish setup on M15.

USDCAD Long @ WPP SL @ 1.24422 TP @ 1.26716
This pair was slightly different to AUDUSD and USDZAR. Trend was bullish, price was at the H4 21 and WPP – all good levels of support in a bullish trend. Price also double bottomed and made a higher high on H1. The caveat here was oil. WTI opened at WM2 and while it had made a lower relative to the low at 50.00 for the previous week and depsite the 21 being below the 55 using tactics on M15 to confirm bearishness at the H4 21/ WPP and bullishness on the Dollar Index would have avoided the long on USDCAD being taken. This trade goes into the bad category due to the trade being taken at support though not using fundamental tools to confirm the entry.

EURUSD Short @ 1.18267 SL @ 1.18912 TP @ 1.7035
Price had fallen at this price several times in previous weeks so it was not an unlikely resistance level. Bears did sell here and there was the potential for a double top on M15 with price having broken through the 55 though H1 was clearly bullish and the target was clearly WM4 with MPP looking like a more likely resistance. I remember thinking this when I wrote the trade plan though I didn’t pay attention to it because I thought the range would hold due to Dollar Index being at support. You see that there is the problem – confirmation bias is a nasty little thing. If the range held then I should have waited for the lower low on M15 and traded the pullback as well as waiting for the confirmation on Dollar Index. I went into this trade, like many of the other trades I posted this week, with a pending order. Be sure that using pending orders means there is no doubt price will rise or fall at that price level.

For the pound short trades – GBPUSD, GBPJPY and GBPCHF – the trades made sense technically and there was a fundamental reason for Pound weakness as far as Brexit is concerned though failure to pay attention to the inflation release is what causes the loss on these trades. While we don’t know how the market will react to news, not being aware of news is unprofessional. Pound was very volatile last week – with Brexit being a possible catalyst for weakness and underscored inflation being a possible catalyst for Pound strength the NET result should have been stay away from Pound. In terms of the GBPJPY long trade plan that was posted later in the week, I feel this was chasing price. The trade failed to deliver on the Bearish side so that natural reaction is it must go up, which also did not work out well. I don’t think Bulls or Bears had an easy time with Pound last week. So the lesson here is if there are conflicting fundamentals rather stay away. One thing to pay attention to though is how useful tactics are when it comes to weekly swings as illustrated in the GBPUSD chart below.

Of all the trade plans uploaded the only good one was WTI. The profit on this trade is 137 points.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

Overall not a stellar week. All of which could have been avoided by paying attention to the news and using tactics on M15 to confirm the trade. Waiting for confirmation on the Dollar Index would have completely changed the way I approached the week. Never ever assume that just because the trend is bullish and that because price is at support (even if it is role reversal or the 21 EMA or a bullish pivot like WPP) it will go up and make a higher high. Above all, ALWAYS pay attention to the change in fundamental data.

I hope you enjoyed this post as much as I enjoyed writing it. I hope others who fell into the same traps have managed to see where they went wrong and how to avoid these errors when trading next week.

Dollar Index M15

A little patience goes a long way. No setup, no trade.

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly! (Part 2)

Last week we looked at a simple method for classifying trades based upon a post-session assessment as to (a) whether or not the trade idea did offer edge, and (b) how well we performed in managing the trade.

Let’s repeat the key points from that article (or click here to review it in full).

During your post-session review you classify them into one of three categories:

  • The Good – Trade ideas which DID have edge and were well managed.
  • The Bad – Trade ideas which DID have edge but were either poorly entered or poorly managed.
  • The Ugly – Trade ideas which DID NOT have edge.

Our aim is to seek constant improvement in our stats. When analysing the stats associated with larger groups of trades (20 minimum), we look for the following:

  • The Good – We want more of these. Always be aiming to increase the percentage of The Good within any sample of trades. And to increase the profit they provide.
  • The Bad – We want less of these. Always be aiming to decrease the percentage of The Bad within any sample of trades. And to reduce the damage they do to P&L.
  • The Ugly – Ideally, we aim for NONE of these. That might be tough. But it’s the goal.

It’s a continual striving for improvement in skill and expertise.

And of course we drive our performance improvement through an effective review process:

  • How can I ensure I take more of these in future? What signs were there pre-trade to suggest this could be one of The Good? Consider both the market structure and the way that price was moving.
  • How could I have have performed even better? Was there any way to have increased size (assuming you scale in and out)? Was there any time or place at which I could have added to the position? Was there reason to extend the targets even further?
  • Were there any non-technical factors present which may have assisted with my decision making? How was my physical state? How was my mental state? How was my emotional state? How was my trading environment?
  • In what way did I underperform with this trade?
  • Why did this occur?
  • How can I ensure I do less of this in future?
  • Were there any non-technical factors present which impacted upon my decision making? How was my physical state? How was my mental state? How was my emotional state? How was my trading environment?
  • How can I ensure I avoid these trades in future? What signs were there pre-trade to suggest this WAS NOT A VALID TRADE? Consider both the market structure and the way that price was moving.
  • Why was I not aware of this at the time?
  • Were there any non-technical factors present which may have assisted with my decision making? How was my physical state? How was my mental state? How was my emotional state? How was my trading environment?

In last week’s article we reviewed on trade which I classified as one of “The Good” (click here to see the trade review again).

Now let’s go on with one of “The Bad”.

So technically, we had a sideways trend and I should be looking only for opportunity LONG off the lower range support and SHORT off the upper range resistance.

But here’s where it gets a little more difficult.

In discussing the trend definition, the YTC Price Action Trader talks about subjectively over-riding the trend definition when we sense it as being wrong.

The fact is that all trend definitions break down at and around the points of transition from one trend-type to another.

And often, you’ll see (or feel) something that is not yet visible in the chart.

I was sensing the rollover of price, transitioning from the sideways trend to a downtrend, effectively forming the rounded top that we saw earlier.

So I pre-empted the change. Price is not yet showing a downtrend. But I’ll be operating as if it was about to make that change.

If I’m wrong, price will let me know. But if I’m right, I can get a nice and early entry into the new trending move.

Let’s review the definition for one of “The Bad”.

  • The Bad – Trade ideas which DID have edge but were either poorly entered or poorly managed.

“Poorly managed” includes failure to re-enter.

Let it go. Move on. There are more trades coming and they need my full attention!

Trading is not a game of perfection.

But rather a game of managing my imperfection, within an environment of uncertainty.

So… just quickly… what about one of The Ugly trades?

These are the ones that, with the benefit of hindsight, just have no edge.

They’re the ones that should never have been taken.

The Bad and The Ugly… they happen.

It’s a part of trading.

But while we accept that, we should always be striving for improvement in skill and expertise.

  • The Good – We want more of these. Always be aiming to increase the percentage of The Good within any sample of trades. And to increase the profit they provide.
  • The Bad – We want less of these. Always be aiming to decrease the percentage of The Bad within any sample of trades. And to reduce the damage they do to P&L.
  • The Ugly – Ideally, we aim for NONE of these. That might be tough. But it’s the goal.

The Good, The Bad and The Ugly! (Part 2)

Last week we looked at a simple method for classifying trades based upon a post-session assessment as to (a) whether or not the trade idea did offer edge, and (b) how well we performed in managing the trade.

Let’s repeat the key points from that article (or click here to review it in full).

During your post-session review you classify them into one of three categories:

  • The Good – Trade ideas which DID have edge and were well managed.
  • The Bad – Trade ideas which DID have edge but were either poorly entered or poorly managed.
  • The Ugly – Trade ideas which DID NOT have edge.

Our aim is to seek constant improvement in our stats. When analysing the stats associated with larger groups of trades (20 minimum), we look for the following:

  • The Good – We want more of these. Always be aiming to increase the percentage of The Good within any sample of trades. And to increase the profit they provide.
  • The Bad – We want less of these. Always be aiming to decrease the percentage of The Bad within any sample of trades. And to reduce the damage they do to P&L.
  • The Ugly – Ideally, we aim for NONE of these. That might be tough. But it’s the goal.

It’s a continual striving for improvement in skill and expertise.

And of course we drive our performance improvement through an effective review process:

  • How can I ensure I take more of these in future? What signs were there pre-trade to suggest this could be one of The Good? Consider both the market structure and the way that price was moving.
  • How could I have have performed even better? Was there any way to have increased size (assuming you scale in and out)? Was there any time or place at which I could have added to the position? Was there reason to extend the targets even further?
  • Were there any non-technical factors present which may have assisted with my decision making? How was my physical state? How was my mental state? How was my emotional state? How was my trading environment?
  • In what way did I underperform with this trade?
  • Why did this occur?
  • How can I ensure I do less of this in future?
  • Were there any non-technical factors present which impacted upon my decision making? How was my physical state? How was my mental state? How was my emotional state? How was my trading environment?
  • How can I ensure I avoid these trades in future? What signs were there pre-trade to suggest this WAS NOT A VALID TRADE? Consider both the market structure and the way that price was moving.
  • Why was I not aware of this at the time?
  • Were there any non-technical factors present which may have assisted with my decision making? How was my physical state? How was my mental state? How was my emotional state? How was my trading environment?

In last week’s article we reviewed on trade which I classified as one of “The Good” (click here to see the trade review again).

Now let’s go on with one of “The Bad”.

So technically, we had a sideways trend and I should be looking only for opportunity LONG off the lower range support and SHORT off the upper range resistance.

But here’s where it gets a little more difficult.

In discussing the trend definition, the YTC Price Action Trader talks about subjectively over-riding the trend definition when we sense it as being wrong.

The fact is that all trend definitions break down at and around the points of transition from one trend-type to another.

And often, you’ll see (or feel) something that is not yet visible in the chart.

I was sensing the rollover of price, transitioning from the sideways trend to a downtrend, effectively forming the rounded top that we saw earlier.

So I pre-empted the change. Price is not yet showing a downtrend. But I’ll be operating as if it was about to make that change.

If I’m wrong, price will let me know. But if I’m right, I can get a nice and early entry into the new trending move.

Let’s review the definition for one of “The Bad”.

  • The Bad – Trade ideas which DID have edge but were either poorly entered or poorly managed.

“Poorly managed” includes failure to re-enter.

Let it go. Move on. There are more trades coming and they need my full attention!

Trading is not a game of perfection.

But rather a game of managing my imperfection, within an environment of uncertainty.

So… just quickly… what about one of The Ugly trades?

These are the ones that, with the benefit of hindsight, just have no edge.

They’re the ones that should never have been taken.

The Bad and The Ugly… they happen.

It’s a part of trading.

But while we accept that, we should always be striving for improvement in skill and expertise.

  • The Good – We want more of these. Always be aiming to increase the percentage of The Good within any sample of trades. And to increase the profit they provide.
  • The Bad – We want less of these. Always be aiming to decrease the percentage of The Bad within any sample of trades. And to reduce the damage they do to P&L.
  • The Ugly – Ideally, we aim for NONE of these. That might be tough. But it’s the goal.
Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
How To Choose Binary Options Broker 2020
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: