The Azure Method – Scam or Not

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

Azure Yöntemi Dürüst Scam İnceleme – Azure Scam!

Azure Yöntemi Dürüst Scam İnceleme – Azure Scam!

Azure Yöntemi Scam Uyarısı

Azure yöntem iddia edilen Anthony Azure tarafından geliştirilen yazılım. Bir deneyimli ikili Seçenekleri tüccar iseniz, hemen bu aldatmaca yazılımı bile tanıtım video olduğunu bilecek. Video başlar en kısa sürede biz bir teknede çok eğlenceli olan bir grup insan görebilirsiniz. Aralarında sözde geliştirici karısı arkadaşları st arasında yer alıyor. Daha sonra Azure Yöntemi farklı üyelerinden banka hesapları çeşitli gösterilmektedir. dengelerin en çok büyük ve bu tür rakamlar rastlamak eğer kesinlikle gözlerinde büyüyen dolar işaretler bulacaksınız.

NOT: AZURE YÖNTEMİ SCAM BİR ALTERNATİF GÜVENİLİR VE ONAYLANDI IS SÜPER BASİT BOT

Azure Yöntemi web otomatik ziyaret hangi ülkeyi algılayabilen bir harita ile gelmek mümkün olmuştur ne çok ilginç. Daha sonra size ülkeden sadece üyeler katılmasına izin inanıyoruz kılan bir mesaj gösterecektir. Orada web sitesinde her örneği gösteren bir pop up mesaj ve temelde kaydolmak için sizi şaşırtmak sadece kayıt ya da yapmak için bir son girişimi.

web sitesinin üst kısmında, Eğer yapmak mümkün olabilir iddia eden bir mesaj var $8750 saat için. para miktarını hesaplamak Eğer yapmış olacak 24 saat bu doğru olsaydı, Eğer gerçekten ayın sonunda bir milyoner olacak! Tek bir parmak kaldırmadan zengin olacak gibi değil. Bir ikramiyeyi kazanmak için olmadıkça Hepimiz böyle bir iddianın tamamen imkansız olduğunu biliyoruz.

PS: BU DAHA VE DİĞER İKİLİ SEÇENEKLERİ HABERLER VE YORUMLAR İÇİN, ‘ I TIKLATIN DAHA FAZLASI İÇİN

Anthony Azure bu alanda deneyim bir sürü profesyonel bir ikili opsiyon tüccar olarak tanıtan. O bize o bu yazılım ile gelip başardı olduktan sonra lüks bir yaşam tarzı elde etmek mümkün olmuştur nasıl videoları gösterir tanıtımı video görüşmeler biridir. Ona hevesle dinlerseniz, Ne diyor hiçbiri çok ilgili veya benzersiz olduğunu göreceksiniz. O bahsediyor şeylerin çoğu diğer aldatmaca sitelerinde duymuş olanların kopyası vardır ve onlar sadece yalan fikirleri ile başınızı dolduracak.

Neden Azure Yöntemi aldatmaca olduğunu

Azure yöntemi geliştirici deneyimi ile bir çok profesyonel bir ikili opsiyon tüccar olduğunu iddia. Bu nedenle o soruları kendisine yöneltilen cevap verecek sosyal medya sitelerinde onu bulmak beklenebilir. Ancak, o hiçbir yerde görülebilir olduğu. Bunun dışında, o bile bize onun sosyal medya hesaplarına herhangi bir bağlantıları vermez de o aslında bu yazılım para kazanmak olduğunu kanıtlamak için onun ticaret hesabına giriş yok.

Azure yöntem kazanç olacağını iddia $8750 Saatte tamamen kadar getirilen. Bir yıl span üzerinden bu tutar hesaplarsanız, bir milyarder olacak. Gerçek şu ki, çeşitli nedenlerle için Azure Yöntemi gelen para miktarı yapabilirsiniz yolu yoktur olmasıdır. Bunlardan biri Azure Yöntemi yazılım tam otomatik pilotta çalışır olduğunu böylece her zaman doğru olacağından emin olabilirsiniz yolu yoktur. İnsanlar tarafından yapılan herhangi bir yazılım olamaz 100% doğru, kayıplar için oda olmalı.

NB: TEST GET, PARA GARANTİ ONAYLI VE GÜVENİLİR ROBOT, Al SÜPER BASİT BOT

Başka bir sebebi neden günlük olarak o kadar para yapamazsınız gibi iddiaları kanıtlamak için hiçbir inandırıcı kanıt olması. Onun hesaba sunum günlükleri bize para tahakkuk ve çekilen bu tür göstermek için bu giriş video Orada hiçbir yerde. Onlar sadece onlar herhangi bir tür iddiaları yedeklemek savunmasız tüccarlar hedefleme yapabilir çünkü bize herhangi bir canlı kanıt gösteren olmadan sözlerini inanmamızı mı bekliyorsunuz değil.

Orada kimin fotoğrafları biz gösterilmektedir bazı insanlar vardır ve onlar Azure Yöntemi yazılımından para ayırdıklarını iddia. Gerçekten de eğer onlar üyeler, Onlar en azından onları canlı ticaret hesaplarına oturum ve onlar hak talep etmek kar tür yapım videoları bize göstermek. Ancak, Eğer gördüğünüz yerine neyi canlı ticaret kanıt bulacaksınız bu sitede hiçbir yerde olmuştur fotoğraf internetten alışveriş var sadece görüntüdür. Yeterince istekli iseniz, diğer scam siteleri benzer fotoğraflar görmüş olabilir.

Bu yazılım para ayırdıklarını iddia insanların yüzlerinde bazıları gerçekten tanıdık görünüyorsun. Bazıları diğer aldatmaca ikili opsiyon siteleri çeşitli ortaya çıkmıştır ve çok böyle aldatmaca işi tecrübeli aktör ve aktrisler vardır. onlar için sorun ne olursa olsun ödenen Onlar sadece sürece bir şey diyecek. Sen çoğu ikili seçenekleri ticaret ne demek hakkında hiçbir fikrim yok olduğunu bilmek için sürpriz olacak ve onlara inanmak karar verirseniz sadece seni yanıltıcı sona erecek.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

NB: İKİLİ ROBOTLAR İÇİNDE BÜYÜK VE DAHA VE ÇOK BÜYÜK DEĞİL İÇİN, ‘ I TIKLATIN İŞTE

Tüm scam siteleri için ortak bir şey orada sınırlı alanlarda olmak hakkında şey. Bu ikili opsiyon ticareti yeni insanlar bir ömür boyu fırsat dışarı kilitli olduğunu düşünüyorum yapmak içindir. Sayfayı yenilemeyi deneyin ve sen-ecek görmek baştan başlayan numaralar veya birkaç gün sonra ve hala “değerli” alanlarda bulmak gelebilirsin.

Azure Yöntemi gibi aldatmaca siteleri duyduğunuzda, Siz onların gerçek amacını öğrenmeden önce onlarla kayıt içine atlamak gerekir değil. Daha iyi diğer kişilerin kendi deneyimlerinden ve oradan öğrenebilirsiniz böylece onları denemek beklemek size sizin için en iyi seçenek olduğuna karar vermek mümkün olacak.

Sonuç

Azure Yöntemi sistemi karlı ne güvenilir ne olduğunu. Web sitesinde sağlanan video ve bilgi bizi kendi karlılığını ikna için yeterli değil. Birçok ikili seçenekleri Web sitesi internette büyük kar yapabilir ama şimdi, Azure Yöntemi kesinlikle tavsiye edilmez. Umarız bu inceleme göz açıcı oldu ve değil kaydolun ve kendi sabit Kazanılan para kaybetme riski stand için başkalarını uyarmak için gidiyorsun. Burada giderek ikili ticaret haber ve değerlendirmeleri iyi alın DAHA FAZLASI İÇİN

Detecting if a .NET app is running in Azure or on a non-Azure environment

We are currently moving some instances of our application to Azure, but will still maintain backwards compatibility with existing instances which are not Azure hosted.

Is there a good way to detect the environment without installing the SDK on the non-Azure production server?

I’ve tried using:

from Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ServiceRuntime, and it works perfectly locally, and in Azure. However, I need to set the Microsoft.WindowsAzure.ServiceRuntime.dll to CopyLocal, and even then I get:

Could not load file or assembly ‘msshrtmi, Version=2.2.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31bf3856ad364e35’ or one of its dependencies

There doesn’t seem to be a NuGet package, and I don’t want to manually copy the msshrtmi dll about.

Scum or not scam? We check ICO on five methods

The Internet is teeming with SEO articles with a bunch of tips on how to evaluate ICO projects. Some detailed, author’s, and others – ordinary water. The founders of the telegram channel “10 $ Buffett” as participants in our blocking conference in Moscow shared with us their criteria on which they evaluate ICO projects. I decided to check whether it is possible to calculate the scam by these criteria in advance. I will check on the two completed tokenails: one became a well-known benches, and the second has not yet shown any signs of that.

But one approach is boring and a little, so I took four more from the Internet and tried to understand which approach is best for defining a bench.

Under the heap of tables.

articles news portal on crypto-currencies bits.media. The portal, in turn, borrowed them from Nick Tomeino, founder of 1confirmation – venture crypto fund for companies in the early stages. In the material, only six points and a lot of reasoning. But they can be singled out in separate questions, following the example of what Alik Arslanov and Artem Popov are asking themselves.

1. Do you really need blocking and tokens to the project?

2. Is the information on the project open?

3. Is there a beta version of the blockbuster?

4. Is it possible to exchange tokens for project resources?

5. Are there any hardcap fees?

6. Does the founder own 10-50% of tokens, and is there a ban on selling them for three years?

Approach # 3: Criteria from Evgeny Lavrinenko

Next ten points from the founder and CEO of the game platform PlayBets Eugene Lavrinenko. They are described in article portal anycoin.news. The material also contains a lot of reasoning and quite general advice like “evaluate the scope of activities.” I tried to specify the questions in each of the paragraphs.

1. Do you need a blocking project?

2. Does the project solve a real problem? Is there a roadmap, whitepaper, presentation and links to social networks?

3. Is the project created by beginners or a team with experience?

4. Is there an MVP?

5. Are there similar solutions on the market?

6. Do you really need blocking and tokens to the project?

7. How are tokens distributed? Is the issue of tokens limited? Are extra tokens burned after ICO? How does the company plan to enter the stock exchange? What is the growth of the token?

8. How detailed are the goals and stages of development in the roadmap?

9. How active is the project in social networks and profile forums?

10. What are softcap and hardcap? What will the money spend? Is there an Escrow? Are smart contracts on GitHub? Are there discounts at different stages of the ICO?

Approach # 4: Evaluation of the token from vc.ru

The site vc.ru also has article , dedicated to the evaluation of ICO-projects. At the very beginning, the authors write that the material is nothing more than a translation of the article from the ICOGO.biz forum. To reach the original article failed, so the author is unknown. But let’s see what the portal for businessmen vc.ru writes.

1. Is the project a startup or a company with experience that goes over to the blockbuster?

2. Is there an MVP?

3. What is the experience and reputation of the team?

4. Is the issue of tokens limited? Are the tokens distributed in parts or at once? What is the role of the token in the project? What part of the tokens are the authors left to themselves?

5. Are there mistakes and mutually exclusive positions in the whitepaper? Is there competition in the market?

6. How active is the project in social networks and profile forums?

Approach # 5: Criteria from ICO TIME

The corrupting news portal ICO TIME also presented article about the ICO. There is a lot of water about the difference between the ICO and the IPO, the legal status of the token, and the criteria themselves are indicated by a short list at the very end of the article. I will consider them.

1. Is there an MVP?

2. Is there a whitepaper and are rules and agreements open?

3. Is the company registered as a legal entity?

4. What is the reputation of the authors of the project?

5. Is there an Escrow? In other words, are the authors ready to guarantee the fulfillment of obligations?

6. Is the project created by beginners or a team with experience?

Evaluation of projects according to the criteria

I’ll try to evaluate a couple of ICO-projects on the above criteria. The choice fell on two projects: one – who managed to become a scum, the other so far proves that everything is in order. Specially chose those in which the site remained, and whitepaper (in cases with scam projects it was more difficult). First, take up the ICO project, which is not a scam – Faceter.

All conclusions will be displayed at the very end – after the tables.

Faceter

The authors of the project Faceter intend to create a decentralized network of “foggy” calculations in order to recognize faces (and certain objects) using video surveillance systems. A kind of “Big Brother” on a global scale. The media wrote that as a result of Pre-sale, $ 10 million was collected in 10 seconds. Total project collected $ 28.6 million

I’ll check the project for each of our approaches.

Does the product solve the real problem?

Is there a global or local problem?

Is it really necessary to have a blockade and ICO?

No. Face recognition systems live without blockage.

What is the token in the project and what is it for?

Payment instrument for the purchase of video surveillance services on the platform Faceter.

What will ensure the turnover of the token?

Demand for video surveillance services.

Are the terms of the tokenail tightened?

No. Standard 10 days for presale and a month and a half for token.

Hard Cap and Soft Cap – delta.

Soft Cap = $ 5 million, Hard Cap = $ 40 million

How many Hard Cap? If a lot, then how will they do it?

$ 40 million is planned to be spent on video cameras, integration with smart home systems and enlarged reality glasses, car recognition.

Does the project make start-ups or entrepreneurs with experience?

Team members are mostly experienced.

How many percent of the tokens they sell, how much does the team take back, what parts does it receive?

40.8% on free sale, 30.8% – operating reserve, 15% – to the team (prohibition of sale for 2 years), 6.9% – bonuses, 6% – advisers’ compensation, 0.5% – bounty.

Is there an MVP and is demand tested? Or the idea of ​​a series of “bonnie for raccoons on the block”?

Demand is checked. MVP could not be verified – there is only a demo video.

What is the action plan after the ICO? Who and how will post-marketing and the formation of the bidding market?

The fully functioning version of Faceter will not appear until the end of 2020. Before that, development is planned. Who will be engaged in post-marketing – it was not possible to find out.

What is the budget for this, and is there any understanding of how this is done?

Could not find out.

HYIP level around the project. The size and activity of the community.

Hyp at the level: $ 10 million on the pre-collected in 10 seconds. The size of the community on Facebook is 3?000 subscribers. Activity could not be determined.

What will they do with those tokens that they will not sell?

How do marketing campaigns to collect the ICO itself, as far as the geographically diverse audience?

Visit international blocking events, develop accounts in social networks and forums. Geography of the audience could not be clarified (theoretically – the whole world).

Is there a KYC procedure? How is it organized?

Could not find out.

Minimum and maximum entry threshold.

The minimum purchase is ?000 FACE tokens for . ETH. The maximum is unknown.

Is there already support from people and companies from the sphere in which the project is being made?

Could not find out.

Who is responsible for legal and financial security?

Director General and Director for Business Development. How to find out was not possible.

Do we actually need blocking and tokens to the project?

No. Face recognition systems live without blockage.

Is the information about the project open?

Is there a beta version of the blockbuster?

Can I exchange tokens for project resources?

Are there any hardcap fees?

Does the founder own 10-50% of tokens, and is there a ban on selling them for three years?

Own 15% of tokens with a ban on sales for two years.

Do you need a blocking project?

No. Face recognition systems live without blockage.

Does the project solve the real problem? Is there a roadmap, whitepaper, presentation and links to social networks?

Solves the real problem. Roadmap, whitepaper, presentation (onepager) and links to social networks – is.

Is the project created by beginners or a team with experience?

Team members are mostly experienced.

Is there an MVP?

MVP could not be verified – there is only a demo video.

Are there similar solutions on the market?

Do we actually need blocking and tokens to the project?

Blocking – no. Tokens are only for project financing.

How are tokens distributed? Is the issue of tokens limited? Are extra tokens burned after ICO? How does the company plan to enter the stock exchange? What is the growth of the token?

40.8% on free sale, 30.8% – operating reserve, 15% – to the team, 6.9% – bonuses, 6% – advisers’ compensation, 0.5% – bounty. Emission is limited. After the ICO, the extra tokens are burned. Plans to enter the stock exchange are unknown. The growth of the token is ensured by the speculative nature of the coin and the demand for it.

How detailed are the goals and stages of development in the roadmap?

Not so much in great detail: at least there are no time frames.

How active is the project in social networks and profile forums?

What softcap and hardcap? What will the money spend? Is there an Escrow? Are smart contracts on GitHub? Are there discounts at different stages of the ICO?

Soft Cap = $ 5 million, Hard Cap = $ 40 million. Money will go to product development. Escrow is missing. The source code is laid out on the GitHub. Discounts at different stages of the ICO are.

Is the project a start-up or a company with experience that goes over to the blockbuster?

The company was founded in 201? so it’s more like a company with experience.

Is there an MVP?

MVP could not be verified – there is only a demo video.

What is the experience and reputation of the team?

Negative feedback on the reputation of individual members of the team could not be found. The team is mostly experienced specialists (with experience in their field of nine years).

Is the issue of tokens limited? Are the tokens distributed in parts or at once? What is the role of the token in the project? What part of the tokens are the authors left to themselves?

Restricted. Distribution occurs in parts within a week after the close of the ICO. The role of the token is a payment instrument for the purchase of video surveillance services on the Faceter platform. The authors keep 15% of all issued tokens.

Are there mistakes and mutually exclusive positions in the whitepaper? Is there competition in the market?

Competition in the market is present. Mutually exclusive positions in the whitepaper could not be found.

How active is the project in social networks and profile forums?

It shows high activity.

Is there an MVP?

MVP could not be verified – there is only a demo video.

Is there a whitepaper and are the rules and agreements open?

Whitepaper in stock. Rules and agreements are open.

Is the company registered as a legal entity?

The company is registered in the Seychelles as a limited liability company.

What is the reputation of the authors of the project?

Is there an Escrow? In other words, are the authors ready to guarantee the fulfillment of obligations?

Escrow is missing.

Is the project created by beginners or a team with experience?

The team is mostly experienced specialists.

PinCoin

Now the other ICO is PinCoin . History shows that this Vietnamese project turned out to be a scum. In April 201? the Vietnamese company Modern Tech, responsible for the launch of two ICOs: PinCoin and Ifan, quietly collected a $ 660 million collected on the token-sensitive ones. It was not possible to find out exactly how much PinCoin was collected. But it is known that the company began to pay commissions to its investors in its own tokens, which can not be cashed anywhere.

PinCoin promised to become a blockbuster platform for the advertising network, auction, investment portal, payment system and P2P-marketplace. I’ll try to understand the project by our criteria.

Does the product solve the real problem?

No. There are a lot of advertising networks, auctions, investment funds, payment systems and marketplaces.

Is there a global or local problem?

There are no problems at all.

Is it really necessary to have a blockade and ICO?

Blocking is not needed, because all components of the platform can work without it. ICO is also a dubious story.

What is the token in the project and what is it for?

In the whitepaper, water is spilled on the use of tokens. In fact – just a means of payment for services within the platform.

What will ensure the turnover of the token?

Demand for platform services.

Are the terms of the tokenail tightened?

No. December for pre-sale, January – for the ICO itself.

Hard Cap and Soft Cap – delta.

Hard Cap – $ 200 million, Soft Cap – $ 50 million

How many Hard Cap? If a lot, then how will they do it?

Hard Cap – $ 200 million. There are no concrete applications for the use of all $ 200 million.

Does the project make start-ups or entrepreneurs with experience?

Information about the team is missing.

How many percent of the tokens they sell, how much does the team take back, what parts does it receive?

23.5% – reserve, 15.0% – system development fund, 15% – future sales, 11% – crowdsdale, 10% – to consultants, 10% to founders, 8.5% to pre-sale, 5% to development fund community, 2% – bounty. The distribution of tokens is immediate, activation is at the end of the crowdsdale.

Is there an MVP and is demand tested? Or the idea of ​​a series of “bonnie for raccoons on the block”?

MVP is absent. As far as demand is tested, it was not possible to find out.

What is the action plan after the ICO? Who and how will post-marketing and the formation of the bidding market?

After the ICO, a mobile application PIN is planned. Who will deal with post-marketing and the formation of the bidding market – is unknown.

What is the budget for this, and is there any understanding of how this is done?

30% of the proceeds go to marketing, 30% – to technical development, 10% – security, 10% – overhead, 10% – to business development, 5% – administrative costs, 5% – legal compliance. About the “understanding” – is unknown.

HYIP level around the project. The size and activity of the community.

The level of the HYIP could not be determined. On indirect grounds (such as collecting $ 660 million together with the project Ifan), we can say that the HYIP is rather big. The Facebook community has 6?000 subscribers. Activity is average.

What will they do with those tokens that they will not sell?

How do marketing campaigns to collect the ICO itself, as far as the geographically diverse audience?

It was not possible to find out.

Is there a KYC procedure? How is it organized?

It was not possible to find out.

Minimum and maximum entry threshold.

The minimum amount of entry is $ 10? the maximum amount is $ 20 thousand.

Is there already support from people and companies from the sphere in which the project is being made?

It was not possible to find out.

Who is responsible for legal and financial security?

It was not possible to find out.

Do we actually need blocking and tokens to the project?

Is the information about the project open?

Is there a beta version of the blockbuster?

Can I exchange tokens for project resources?

In the future, yes.

Are there any hardcap fees?

There are – $ 200 million

Does the founder own 10-50% of tokens, and is there a ban on selling them for three years?

Belongs to 10%, there is no ban on sale.

Do you need a blocking project?

Does the project solve the real problem? Is there a roadmap, whitepaper, presentation and links to social networks?

Does not solve real problems. Roadmap, whitepaper, links to social networks – are present. There is no presentation.

Is the project created by beginners or a team with experience?

Information about the team is missing, could not be determined.

Is there an MVP?

Are there similar solutions on the market?

There is, in abundance.

Do we actually need blocking and tokens to the project?

Blocking – no. Tokens are only for project financing.

How are tokens distributed? Is the issue of tokens limited? Are extra tokens burned after ICO? How does the company plan to enter the stock exchange? What is the growth of the token?

23.5% – reserve, 15.0% – system development fund, 15% – future sales, 11% – crowdsdale, 10% – to consultants, 10% to founders, 8.5% to pre-sale, 5% to development fund community, 2% – bounty. Emission is limited. Extra tokens are not burned. Plans to enter the stock exchange are unknown. Growth is provided by the speculative nature of the token and the demand for platform services.

How detailed are the goals and stages of development in the roadmap?

The time steps are described in some detail.

How active is the project in social networks and profile forums?

Activity is above average.

What softcap and hardcap? What will the money spend? Is there an Escrow? Are smart contracts on GitHub? Are there discounts at different stages of the ICO?

Hard Cap – $ 200 million, Soft Cap – $ 50 million. 30% of revenue goes to marketing, 30% – to technical development, 10% – security, 10% – overhead, 10% – to business development, 5% – administrative costs, 5% – legal compliance. Escrow is missing. There are no links to GitHub. Discounts are not available.

Is the project a start-up or a company with experience that goes over to the blockbuster?

Is there an MVP?

What is the experience and reputation of the team?

Information about the team is missing, could not be determined.

Is the issue of tokens limited? Are the tokens distributed in parts or at once? What is the role of the token in the project? What part of the tokens are the authors left to themselves?

Emission is limited. Distribution occurs at one time. The role of the token is a means of payment for platform services. The authors keep 10% of the tokens (plus a reserve of 23.5% of the total number).

Are there mistakes and mutually exclusive positions in the whitepaper? Is there competition in the market?

Errors and mutually exclusive positions could not be found. Competition in the market is present.

How active is the project in social networks and profile forums?

Activity is above average.

Is there an MVP?

Is there a whitepaper and are the rules and agreements open?

Whitepaper in stock, all the rules – it’s the same.

Is the company registered as a legal entity?

Yes. The Vietnamese Modern Tech is in charge of the project.

What is the reputation of the authors of the project?

It was not possible to find out.

Is there an Escrow? In other words, are the authors ready to guarantee the fulfillment of obligations?

Escrow is missing.

Is the project created by beginners or a team with experience?

Information about the team is missing, could not be determined.

Tokensail PinCoin does not hold even a weak criticism for any of the approaches, except # 2. There is no MVP in the project, there is not a word about the team, but there is a high activity in social networks and a promise of 40% return on investment every month. Nevertheless, the authors managed to fool the people into impressive money.

Faceter looks much more impressive, why the project should be treated with even greater attention. The team is experienced, the objectives and distribution of funds are described in some detail. But the high level of the HYIP and the fact that you can not properly check the MVP of the project are very embarrassing.

Which approach is better?

As you can see, approaches # 1 and # 3 contain the most questions, which makes the picture of ICO slightly more understandable. In the first there is no question about Escrow, but there is a question about the legal and financial security, which it somehow compensates. But approach # 1 is the only one where there is a question about the KYC procedure.

Approaches # 4 and # 5 are a sort of “minimal set” of questions that a potential investor should ask himself. Criteria of evaluation are not so that very much, but all are quite important. We can single out approach # 5 as the only one where the investor should ask about the verification of the legal entity.

In approach # ? there is no question of team experience and MVP. Nothing is asked about the distribution of tokens. The approach can be considered the most untenable.

About how experts evaluate and launch the ICO, the starters themselves (and already experienced businessmen) will tell on the blocking events of the company Smile-Expo. The nearest will be held at Georgia (June 20) and France (July 18): separate panel discussions are devoted to the topic of ICO. Next will be the conference in Sweden , Ukraine , Azerbaijan , Switzerland and Belarus .

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
How To Choose Binary Options Broker 2020
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: