The Action-Reaction Model Another Trading Mistake

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

Action/Reaction Theory

Martin Lenoar respectfully asks that people use the discussion page, their talk page or email them, rather than contribute to this page at this time. This page might be under construction, controversial, used currently as part of a brick and mortar class by a teacher, or document an ongoing research project. Please RESPECT their wishes by not editing this page.

Contents

Action/Reaction Theory [ edit ]

An attempt to explain the development of matter from the beginning of the universe.

Note from the Author [ edit ]

If the Action/Reaction Theory [ART] brings up some questions, and there will be many, then please use the ART-Questions page and if there is already an answer then I will tell you.

If you would like to discuss different opinions, POV or compare other theories then please use the ART-Discussion page.

If you have made your own research relevant to the ART then please tell me and others on the ART-Research page.

And if any of the above is relevant to but not in the theory yet then I will, with your consent, include it into the theory.

If the ART sparked any new idea which you would like to follow then please feel free to refer to the ART as you see fit.

Inprovement through collaboration!

Since I am new to the internet, wikiversity and also seem to speak my own version of english it seem to be the best when I have another copy of the ART to give collaboration a chance. It is on the ART-Action/Reaction_Theory page.

Introduction [ edit ]

The Action/Reaction Theory [ART] is a theory which is constantly build up and therefore never finished. Like any other theories. The difference is that it is build up through happenings which can be readily observed and, if no such relevant action can be found, is left open ended and is not speculated on. Which basicaly makes sure that there is an answer before it is accepted (build into the theory). That such a relevant action can be found today is garanteed by the observation that everything is build up (adapted) from something which has been there before and that nothing is a ‘new’ creation. With other words the meaning of ‘action-reaction’ is that this happening feeds itself and it is only left to explain how it can evolve from something very simple to something very complicated.
The “Natural Principles” section tries to explain how observations made today can help to understand the past and even the future.

The idea of the ART is worked out in the “Growing through movement” section. It is not an extention to other theories (but might have many similarities). In fact how atoms became into being has only been hinted on trough what might have happened before. This also gives the ART the possibilities that it reveals something which contradicts other ‘knowledge’. Therefore, to make sense of what the Newton Cradle offers and what is described in “Step 1” to “Step 6”, is it the best not to try to compare it to what is ‘known’ – basically start new. The ART uses the natural action/reaction happening, which the Newton Cradle performs, to explain a natural build up of bigger and bigger matter systems which are created through evolution. And therefore is a possible explanation how the stage of evolution, as of today, evolved.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

The “Extension of definition of the terms used” section, serves to adapt natural phenomenon which are also present and therefore described in other theories, to the ART. Since they usually have the same meaning is it the best to also use the same words to refer to them but it needs to be kept in mind that sometimes they might point out more and sometime even contradict. What the differences will be can only be determined when the ART is fully worked out.

For this the A/R theory needs to be dragged into the lab. If different matter sizes can be set up like a Newton Cradle and the energies which are send in and come out are made visible then certain tests and conclusions can be made. The ART can speed up to explain the changes which happen because it opens a possibility which could be looked into. If the changes can be connected to what the ART suggest, different changes with different placement of the matters, then it could be called an energy-signature. (A relevant action is observed through the spectrometer which reveals that different atoms leave their marks in the light spectrum according to their size and its relevant natural frequency. Which is also used to analyse the build up of stars.)
Until this is done everything is in limbo – it is still only a theory. Therefore any attempt to nail anything down is only an attempt to predict what it could be and serves only to satisfy the need to force answers with a fantasy (even if it has been proven with mathematics).
The ART is therefore a theory of reality. Which means that what happens naturally has to be real. Or, if something does not exist physically than it cannot be used. Even the ‘fantasy’ used by nature is always build on real existence. Human have developed such a high level language that anything can be given any meaning with words. Unfortunately every meaning stored in the brain is real for the brain and if there was no specific notion that it relates to a fictional matter it will be recalled and used like any other real meaning. Therefore after a while, when used without this differentiation, all meanings are accepted as real. Therefore, for humans, what can be and what cannot be natural is lost because reality is mingled with fiction. This is what the ART tries to avoid by only ‘storing’ real happenings.

Some of the examples are: Wave form movement:

A wave cannot be performed from a single matter (here it is only a graphical display). Unless there are a string of matters, ‘physically’ connected, there will be no wave.
Passing on of energy:
Small space:
Big energies cannot be passed on by small matter unless it is able to move at a very high speed. But for this it needs a big empty space. But a big empty space prohibits solid (filled) matter.
Big space:
Energy cannot be passed on unless there is a medium (matter) to be passed on to (filled space). Therefore if a space is empty (devoid of matter) then there cannot be any passing on of energy (radiation is not a passing of energy).
Reduction of size:
If matter is a filled mass which occupies a specific space, which cannot be occupied at the same time with another mass, then, realistically, it cannot be reduced to a space much smaller than this mass.

The working of nature [ edit ]

Fundamentals of physics [ edit ]

When it was discovered that the atom is not a solid matter but build of other particles then the question of how the atom is constructed needed to be answered. There were two models which were in consideration. The ‘plum pudding’ and the ‘nuclear’ model. Short a space filled with matter and a mostly empty space. To get the answer, in 1911 Ratherford made a test. He shot alpha particles into a very thin gold plate and concluded his answer from the effect it had. Most alpha particles went right through and only some where deflected in different direction. He figured that since most went through the atom must be empty and the one which were deflected struck the nucleus. Or so he and other people thought. Apparently he had not seen a Newton Cradle in action. Otherwise he might have needed to consider that the alpha particles passed on a characteristic energy to the gold plate, which was passed through and catapulted like particles out on the other side. Which would have been another possibility and the test could not have been answered. Since the passed on energy can also be diverted in different direction the reflections could have been explained. (‘Fundamentals Of Chemistry’, ISBN 0-673-07876-0).

The Newton Cradle [NC] [ edit ]

What the Newton Cradle demonstrates is that an energy can be passed or being transformed through moving or stationary matter. Since the type of action, which is performed on one end, is decisive on what kind of reaction is evoked the conclusion can be made that the energy, travelling through the matters, also carries some information. Which leads to the possibility that any energy, passed on or transformed can be overloaded with energy inherent in the matter through which it travels.

Which gives it the possibility to be used as a form of communication – passing on information. A communication which only needs forms of matter to send or receive. A possibility which the ART tries to exploit.

Sample and possible prove:

Since the matter , which form the Newton cradle, are not made of one single mass it is almost certain that there are energies active within this matter which hold the matter physically together. Therefore what could be assumed is that the energy which is passed through might have picked up other ‘energy’ information on its way through the matters. Energies, which might reveal the natural frequencies the matters in the line have, according to their size and build up. And if this natural frequencies are already known then it might also reveal the position of that matter in the line.
The ART uses this relevant action to explain how the world could have been built with passing energies from matter to matter.

Natural Principles [ edit ]

In order to find out how something works is to observe it while it is working. When we look out of the window then we see a very diverse, and surly complicated moving environment created by nature. To figure out all the details within a lifespan of a human seem to be impossible. But what a human can do is to find some repetitions, which happen during the time he is observing, which give him some indications on what principles this world is based on. And the first surprise would be: there are not many!
The first obvious principle is that nothing would happen if there is no movement. When movements are analysed then it seems that there are no purposes to any. Things might happen because something else has happened. What is happening is defined by what has happened, on what it has happened and the circumstances in which it has happened. And the next thing to happen is because of what has just been described has happened. If some lifeless matter falls toward the earth then it does not know where it will fall to and what will happen after it made contact.
Another fact, which seem to need to be present so that something can happen, is that the parts which come together as a result of an action (happening) have to be in a state of opposition. Physically that means that if something warm comes in contact with a cold part then there will be an exchange of temperature. If something moving encounters a stationary object then a form of exchange of movement will take place to equal the state of movement according to the physical properties of the parts. If the minds of living creatures are in an opposite state when they encounter each other then there will be some form of war.
And even that there are many different things which are happening, they all seem to be highly repetitious. Meaning that alike actions always provoke the same reactions if it happens in the same environment (conditions). Changes (adaptations) are only happening if the environment has changed.

This observed principles can be connected to form some regularity:

  • Opposition creates movement.
  • Movement creates chance.
  • Chance creates repetition.
  • Repetition guaranties an ongoing evolution.

But there is one trend which seem to overlay all this happenings. Any change usually destroys something so that something can be build. Which is usually a bigger adapted version of something already working. With other words the trend is from small to big.
This are very important observations because they show very significant facts about nature. Nature has no goals, it could be termed ‘physical happenings by chance’. It has no goal in its mind what it is supposed to create. It has no mathematics to calculate if something will work or not. It is also under no time pressure. And, most of all, it cannot say: “this did not work, lets start over”. It seems to run on ‘chemical reactions’ which are guided by the physical properties of matter. Physical properties are all what is available to build every small or big physical part to be found in this universe. And that should be all what is needed to explain what is happening. But there must be more to guarantee an evolution like the one which we can observe. If you want to build something new from something old then you must have a memory of that something old. If you want to adapt it to changes which have occurred, then you must know how the new facts differ from the old ones. With other words, if something should be changed then there must be something which can be changed. And there must be some possibility to compare. Since there is no known overall control over the evolutionary happenings then there must be some basic intelligence build in the system, which enables what seem to be an endless chain reaction of the same principles.

Survival Tricks [ edit ]

Living creatures are a product of the working principals of nature. But principals alone cannot make a living creature successful. Nature has long before humans discovered that if you want to run a machinery in top condition over time than you have to replace its parts, as needed, regularly with new ones.
Nature has discovered how to reproduce, repeat, compare, select and discard. And many other things. With other words everything humans or other living creatures use to survive – nature has already used. Otherwise living creatures could not have adopted it to their needs.
Which reveals that any question on how this world (universe) works and why can be answered through nature and its working. There are always relevant actions to this question somewhere in action.

Growing through movement [ edit ]

Evolution – growing naturally [ edit ]

Naturally, in this case, means that whatever happens is purely physical. There are no immediate or long term predefined purposes which guide what is happening, only the possibilities that a physical action can happen. And there are absolute no restrictions on what can happen.
The facts, that the evolution of matter goes from small to big, and that there is no knowing change of principles, makes the ‘reconstruction’ of the development which has happened in the universe, as known today, possible.
Therefore we start out with an endless space which is filled with an infinite amount of the smallest matter (mass) possible – the UrParticle [UP].
But this is enough. Matter, no matter how small, seem to have the possibility to bind with another matter to form something bigger. And to figure out how this is possible we need to combine what we have learned from the Newton Cradle and what else nature teaches us.
The universe is big enough so that we can use quite a big part to explain nature, without reaching its borders. Therefore for our purpose there is no exchange with any matter from outside of the universe. Which means we deal with a fixed amount of matter even if the universe is, for our feeling of size, endless.
But we also always have to have in mind that, since there are no predefined purposes, there are no ‘mistakes’. Everything is right, no matter what is the outcome. There is also never a ‘starting over’ – once it started it just goes on. Therefore whatever are the principals today were the principles at the assumed start and will be in the future.

Step 1: growth by size – 3 dimensional [ edit ]

If matter is moving then there is the possibility that it collides (make physical contact) with another one. And there is the possibility that after a collision they stay together and grow (build) into a new form of matter. This is possible if the movements of the matters are in harmony, which means that their frequencies, directions, strength and phase match. They can be added without that they move the UPs apart. Since there is no pulling force active between the UPs at this stage it needs pressure of the environment to keep the UPs together. But probably both UPs had their movements changed since an exchange of movement (adaptation) took place. If they actually stay together then they now move in unison in a new combined form of movement.
When there is enough empty space available in the environment then this movement can be a straight one with the appropriate direction and speed. But if the environment restricts or even prohibits free movement then the physical movement takes on an appropriate form or stops in which case the physical movement has to be passed on as a potential movement (potential energy). If none of the UPs can pass this potential movement on to the environment then it is passed on between the UPs which have collided and these may start to oscillate the potential movement between them. Since, in this case, this passing on of potential movement is directed toward each other it gives the impression that the UPs are drawn to each other. They physically stay together now on their own (no pressure needed). This rises the energy level of the now physically joint matter which can be termed that they are exited or charged or have a higher temperature. Therefore what is otherwise a one time happening, can become continuous while the two, now joint UPs, exchange a potential movement between each other. Specifically if energy is constantly supplied from the environment which restricts their movement and applies pressure on them.
Now, the new form of matter does not physically move and actually occupies the smallest space it can. Since the physical movement before the collision needed lots of space, room is now left into which the environment (pressure) can bring other UPs from outside. Which, under the right conditions, could join into the energy exchange and therefore grow the matter again. E.g. into a ring like formation where the potential movement is passed on in a circle. With the possibility that this ring formations can grow into any size.
If any matter in the ring is not physically touching the matter to which it is passing the energy then the passing on is interrupted (resistance). Therefore, on the next pass of energy (cycle), the inertia of the UP which has physical space available will transform the potential movement into a physical move, directed toward the next matter in line, until it touches the next matter and then pass on the remaining potential movement. Opening space in the ring will be closed consecutively by movements of matter, with the additional effect of a shift in the phase, until no space is left.
This passing on of energy in ring form provides the possibilities that any matter in this ring can be a member of more rings which pass energy through it. The amount of energies which can be passed through an UP in different directions at the same time is probably limited because at some point this energies will cancel each other out or add up to a form which is impossible to pass on. But the possibility is there. And if rings join then the matter can grow in different directions into matter which is build of interconnecting rings.
In multi-ring formations energy is passed on in different direction which might impose some physical regulations on the form which can be build. This would include of where rings can be joint, how many rings can be interconnected and in which direction energy can be passed before the form falls apart again. Which means that the many passed on energies within the form must sum up to an equilibrium of energies which is characteristic for this form – an energy signature [ES]. Which means that if an energy is passed on to this formation it could be imprinted with a specific sequence of energies which are active within when it is passed through. Or the reaction will be specific to this sequence if it is acted on regarding to changes, redirection or split up (functionality).
But this also provides the possibility that stable forms of matter can be build which react with always the same specific functions when the circumstances are the same (provides a specific feedback). Once an ES is reached through the building and arranging of rings then the growth of size of this form ends. The urparticles [UP] of matter have grown into an element matter [EM].

Step 2: growth by repetition – 1 dimensional [ edit ]

The possibilities to grow does not end with the EM. In the overall shape of an EM there might be spots which enable to grow out rings which might not change the ES of the EM but provide the possibility to pass on energies or ES with some added control. Which might enable to grow another form there in consequence of the sequence of energy which is passed (ES). If EM connect direct together the physical selection is limited. Both sides need to be connected to a place in their surface which is able to pass on the same kind of energy (movement). If they do not have that condition provided then they cannot hook up. And of course there has to be a chance that the EMs can come close enough and are right posi-tioned to each other.
Another possibility is that EMs have developed which can act as connecting centers which pass all sorts of energies in different directions without overloading them with its own. Since ESs are in essence a sequence of passed on energies they can be taken in at different connections (maybe one energy at a time), compared or handled otherwise and send out again in maybe one or more directions. Which would increase the intelligence level of the manipulation of passed on energies or ESs. Which would provide the possibilities to handle EMs in symbolic form like a word. Forms of EM can be duplicated, complimented or compared without the need to now how it is physically build up. This has been translated into a sequence of energies. That this functionality is used by nature is shown through the C-atom in the amino group of an amino-acid (molecule) which can connect to four EMs. Which also shows the possibilities such connecting EMs [CEM] provide. E.g. the immense amount of functionalities or data, which systems of EMs provide, which can be placed in any sequence to provide unlimited possibilities. This can be seen as the beginning of the development of segmented systems and the basis of functionalities which are developed to a much higher level and applied in a brain.

Step 3: growth by repetition – 2 dimensional [ edit ]

If growth has produced a chain of EMs and if they are connected by CEMs, then there is the possibility that the CEMs which form links to the CEMs of another chain. Or they can ‘grow’ a duplicate of the systems of EM, which they connect, out of the vacant connections. Which would form a blanket of chains or a 2 dimensional memory.

Step 4: growth by building 3 dimensional systems [ edit ]

If 1 or 2 dimensional shapes are physically moved (or only partially) by pressure of the environment than there are the possibilities that they could form any kind of 3 dimensional shapes. Some with functionality others with none.

Step 5: growth by physical adaptation [ edit ]

When EMs have grown into shapes which constitute a 3 dimensional physical shape then this physical shape can provide a condition which has to be met before its energy-function can be performed. Like a EM-blanket forms a tube through which matter, charged with a specific energy, has to pass to get to the place where it triggers a specific reaction. This adapts the movement of the EM to the physical shape of the environment which in turn could change the shape or functionality of the travelling EM. A form of feedback from the environment which adds conditions to the action. A higher level of intelligence.

Step 6: growth by teaching [ edit ]

When EMs have grown into a shape which is able to control the movement of other EMs then it has the possibility to control the growth of this matter. E.g. if a tube of EMs guide the movement of an EM along its path then it can make it connect to certain EMs which are part of the tube and imprint some parts of the ES on the passing EM. Which would create an EM system with a predefined set of functionality.
Which means that the possibilities to react are now placed besides the possibilities to act and, with a constant source of energies, can keep on going to act/react to fulfil a predefined function. Which also means that the evolution is not any more a function of chance but now happens with a purpose. A next level of intelligence.

Step 1 to nnn: [ edit ]

There are many steps which lead to the growing which nature has reached today and are most likely not specific at all. With a lot of fantasy many can be envisioned. But the ART is not a theory of fantasy. Therefore the basics of the ‘Growth by movement’ has to be worked out first and then the steps of growth will either become obvious or have to be worked out individual as well.

The dynamics of the natural change (evolution) [ edit ]

When matters meet then they are more likely charged with different energies (movement). If these energies constitute an opposition (frequency and phase match but the direction or strength differ) then there will be some exchange (levelling) of energy and therefore some change in the charge of each matter. Since every change is memorized then there are no goals or mistakes. It is naturally that the changed matter lead to new changes since same conditions have same reactions. If there are only UP involved then this does not lead to much. Only the vast space of the universe ensures that different conditions can exist at different places. But if matter has grown into complicated EM then the change involves whole systems of UPs. Since the growing does not stop there, since equivalent EM can have different changes and since all changes are ‘kept’ then the possibilities that matter grows into very different ‘systems’ from the same basics are unlimited. Which systems are put together to form an even bigger system depends on the circumstances (action, environment, feedback, conditions) in which this changes take place.
Basically growing means that something has to be there which can be grown (adapted) according to the circumstances. Which also means that nothing is new, only changed.

Evolution and intelligence [ edit ]

The growing of matter, controlled by feedback, in different stages constitutes an intelligence (learning, memorizing, reusing) on its own. Since matter grows more and more complicated the intelligence, which is a functionality of matter, also ‘grows’. But, since the environment also needs to be considered, which provides the feedback and which is in the early stages where mostly everything is based on chance, the evolutionary processes are unique. Therefore, to establish the exact functionality of each ‘intelligence level’ the different stages (conditions) have to be physically performed.

To prove the Action/Reaction Theory [ edit ]

The prove of the A/R theory lies in the existence of an energy-signature in small matter. Which could be the equivalent of the spectrum which a spectrometer reveals for stars. Even if it proves that the special size of matter exists because its natural frequency is blacked out because of absorbance. If this ESs can be proven to exist then it can be assimilated to a language of nature. A language (communication) which enables all kind of changes within matter of any size.

When the Newton cradle is developed further into a higher technology then it should be possible to prove this. E.g. if a speaker cone is touching a series of identical glasses filled to different levels with water then it should be possible to get each glass individually to respond if the speaker transmits a frequency equivalent to its natural frequency. If the other end of the line is connected to a microphone cone and further to a microscope then maybe it can pick up changes in the wave-form which might be now more then just one sound and which could reveal the natural oscillation frequencies of each glass (energy signature). If it also reveals the position of the glasses in the sequence then this should be different if the sequence of the glasses is changed. If this could be accomplished then it should be possible to transfer this technic into the nano-meter range. Where it would solve many mysteries. Which are only mysteries because of the lack of explanation, but since they exist there must be a physical possibility for it. Like: how can a virus adapt to medication; how can specific cells be destroyed without harming others; how can microbes select specific molecules, split them into their basic parts and use this parts to clone them-selves; or how can a river-shell, which has never ‘seen’ a fish, grow out of its shell the exact duplicate of a fish to attract bigger fish.

Mathematic as prove! [ edit ]

Mathematic is a science of repetition. Which means something has to work repeatedly so that a formula can be constructed to define this action. Its weakness lies in the fact that it lends itself to the possibility to explain something physically where there is no physical repetition (like a theory). Simply by introducing parameters which might not even exist physically (like time) or by leaving vital parameters out which might prove a certain POV but also changes the original limitations which it provided (like 4th and higher dimensions). Which, with the human ingenuity, can easily be ignored.

Sine Wave and Channel Reflection, Action/Reaction putting it all together

Something to start the juices flowing.

Think of price action in terms of channels forming sine waves gaining and losing energy as they move, the basis of Peaks and Troughs, ABCD’s and such, given the initial action can we calculate the probable path and terminus of the reaction?

Think like a slinky.

edit, one pick to help spur the thought process, don’t worry about the math just the concept.

  • Post # 2
  • Quote
  • Apr 15, 2020 12:06pm Apr 15, 2020 12:06pm

Hyperbolas and Ellipses are awesome as are any of the conic sections.

Some blasts from my past. The angle between mated ellipses is typically a major division of the circle.

The slinky concept is something I’ve used as an analogy quite a bit. A slinky with ends connected is a torus. Ellipses are cross sections of a torus. A circle is nothing more than a straight on view and is an ellipse with an eccentricity of 1. Toroidal motion is vorticular. I think I just made that word up,but the image below should explain better.

  • Post # 3
  • Quote
  • Apr 15, 2020 12:16pm Apr 15, 2020 12:16pm

I’ve explored the sine wave concept quite a bit in the past. One of the issues is that price/time doesn’t draw well on a 2d Chart. the z axis needs to be taken into account. My current research is trying to find the axis in terms of 3d space. Much like a 2-point perspective drawing.

Ending up with something similar along the lines of the image below.

  • Post # 4
  • Quote
  • Edited at 7:59pm Apr 15, 2020 3:26pm | Edited at 7:59pm

what exactly are you intending to use for the 3 axes? I’ve done some work here.
You can use any 3 d plotting program to plot it out.

And assuming you do, what are you looking for?

Below is a sine wave lagged against itself in 3d, with artificial VP perspective via skewing. Regarding probabilities, there isn’t much visually that you’ll ascertain in common financial time series that you wouldn’t be able to estimate via numerical methods (been there). Truly Chaotic time series (think Lorentz) is a different case, however.
http://i42.tinypic.com/2upbcsl.jpg

  • Post # 5
  • Quote
  • Apr 17, 2020 5:12am Apr 17, 2020 5:12am
  • Post # 6
  • Quote
  • Apr 17, 2020 9:57am Apr 17, 2020 9:57am

JR don’t worry about hijacking the thread, I throw up the subject matter to stir conversations, you share an idea and sometimes someone else has a different view or angle (pardon the pun) that might help.

Of all the studies undertaken over the years, no one study has produced a gauge or tool that effectively contains the market 100%, however there are some that seem to work well at times. I must add that the setup or tool is only one part of the equation as the Trader themselves is equally important to the success of a trade.

When I first opened this thread it was to explore the idea of reversal behavior, is there an approach that identifies “a reversal construction” that would indicate wave behavior. We can look at historical charts, put the lines and arcs to them, but in real time it’s impossible at times to trade such.

As you know, I’m a big fan of pitchforks, but not in the traditional sense. I see them in terms of those slinky’s. The two major applications used are the normal fork (bisection of B&C points) and the modified schiff ( which forms the natural channel of the 3 prior points). (my apologies from this point on to any traditional Andrew followers)

Now to the forker, the major question is when and where is the 3rd point to draw my fork, and how do I enter a trade. Most look for some type of proof that the current movement has ended, many use normal trend line breaks and such, but I’d suggest that a better proof of the prior moves terminus would be in it’s reflective price action in the reversal.

Now, forks use straight lines, a better approach would be found in arcs, but here’s what was crossing my old bear brains,

to get started a few pics of the general thought, I’ll refine this much much more, in future posts, the outer reflective angles could easily be replaced by an arc or ellipse to mirror the reflective movement, but I’ll use an adjusted fork set to this reflective angle for future targets, more to come

please note, time constraints are a major problem for me atm, so post at will, I’ll catch up when able.

Checking your browser before accessing genius.com.

This process is automatic. Your browser will redirect to your requested content shortly.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:
  • BINARIUM
    BINARIUM

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!

  • BINOMO
    BINOMO

    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
How To Choose Binary Options Broker 2020
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: