Review Pros and Cons Of Markwn Online Store Uncovered!

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!


    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

One Product Store vs General Store: The Pros and Cons

David Linder

Starting a dropshipping business is easier said than done. There are so many things to consider and prepare before you launch your online store. You’ll have to come up with a budget, determine what to sell, set up an eCommerce store, find a reliable supplier, and so on.

Most startups find the stage of deciding what products to sell very confusing. Even seasoned drop shippers can’t easily decide on whether to sell one product only or carry multiple products in their eCommerce stores. To help you decide on the matter, it would be best to learn the pros and cons of one product store vs general store.

The truth is, there’s no absolute answer as to which model works best. The decision on having a single product or multiple products to sell depends on your current situation, your skills, and your goals. The thought of having a variety of products to sell seems appealing. When you have more goods to sell, you’ll be able to offer more choices to consumers, right? But it does not always work that way!

To help you determine the kind of dropshipping store you’ll establish, let me discuss the advantages and disadvantages of a one product concept versus a multiple products concept.

One Product Store

In this concept, you will only drop ship a single product – nothing else.

The Pros:

  • You can serve an under-served market in any niches that you choose.
  • Target a particular group of consumers is easier.
  • The conversion rate is higher than the general store.
  • High conversion rate means it will be easier to scale.
  • You’ll have a better focus and find a profitable product.
  • A single product is easy to convert into a brand.
  • Easy to promote with influencer collaboration.
  • You can sell the store with less hassle at a good price.
  • Analyze information with less difficulty because you will only get feedback on one product.
  • Effortlessly sustain valuable customer service.
  • A single product gets all the consumers attention.

The Cons:

  • A single product has a higher chance of failure.
  • It may need a higher budget.
  • Flexibility of a single product is very limited.
  • It will be longer to set up if you’ll build multiple stores to come up with the winning product.
  • A high risk of losing the market when there’s no demand for it later on.
  • It may not raise enough money to support and sustain business expenses in the long term.
  • You can’t cross-sell to increase your revenue with one product.
  • Marketing opportunity is a bit difficult to find.
  • The probability of return customers is low as people might need your product for one time only.

General Store

In a general store concept, you can sell products from various niches such as computers, clothing, electronics, and toys.

The Pros:

  • You can reach more people when you sell multiple products.
  • Cross-selling of products is highly possible.
  • A general store is more stable than one product store.
  • It is flexible to start because you don’t need to focus on a specific niche only.
  • You can test multiple niches in your store at the same time.
  • It has long term potential because you can easily pivot to different products.
  • Easiest and quickest to set up than other options.

The Cons:

  • A general store is not brandable.
  • Collaboration with an influencer is difficult as there are many products to promote.
  • Conversion rate is low because most visitors are only checking out products without buying intent.
  • Visitors with no buying intent only consume the bandwidth and the paid marketing budget of the store.
  • A general store has more competition than a single product store.

Whichever concept you might choose, it is always important that you provide a good service to your customers. It would help your store reputation if you forward any feedback that you’ll receive to the supplier to improve product quality and delivery. By improving the quality of the product, the return rate will be reduced also.

Is a free market “free” if it’s regulated?

The Pros and Cons of a Free Market

Essentially, capitalism is a free market system of trade, governed exclusively on the economic principle of supply and demand and maintained through competition. Consumers and businesses form a relationship that ultimately determines the cost of a good or service and the health of the market. If demand is up and supply can adequately satisfy it, then the market is strong. Lots of people have money to buy new things, more new things are produced and sold, and wealth is generated. This wealth is then dispersed throughout the society, all strata of which ultimately benefit: Companies require labor in boom times, thus increasing employment; taxes paid on that wealth end up funding government social programs for the poor.

If a market hits a bump in the road — for example, through a stock market crash or a housing slump — demand decreases. Less wealth is generated, employment decreases and ultimately, the poorer classes suffer most. This is the stickiest aspect of capitalism; it’s highly Darwinian in nature. Companies unfit to operate (and inherently taxing to the capitalist system) won’t weather an economic downturn. Those that can make it through a recession — which is simply a decline in economic progress — have ultimately proven that they’re an asset to the economy.

This is how the market corrects itself. A recession strips away bad assets, whether in the form of a poorly designed security or a badly managed business. Those remaining should be strong enough to rebuild the market. After a recession ends, the process will begin again.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!


    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

So it’s natural that capitalism fosters competition. In “The Wealth of Nations,” economist Adam Smith, regarded as the father of capitalist theory, laid out how capitalism inherently protects members of a society. When supply outpaces demand, companies compete to offer the lowest price to consumers, who benefit from the competition [source: Smith].

But a competitive marketplace also encourages companies to do everything in their power to maximize profits. Companies seek to achieve monopolies — sole control of a good or service, wherein prices are set by the company rather than market demands. Wages are set as low as laborers will tolerate. Steps to ensure consumer protections such as safety and quality should be taken only insofar as they attract a customer base. Capitalism itself is often criticized as an amoral system, since it prizes the self above others [source: Greider].

Smith pointed to built-in checks and balances of the capitalist system that are meant to prevent abuse. For example, higher wages mean a laborer can afford to properly feed himself or herself. In Smith’s words, “[a] plentiful subsistence increases the bodily strength of the laborer” [source: Smith]. So a company that pays more than average wages will create a stronger workforce and increase its productivity, giving it a competitive edge in the marketplace.

When Smith’s capitalist theory was put into practice in the nascent United States, these natural checks and balances didn’t always emerge. As a result, the federal government has enacted forced checks and balances to counteract the weight produced by unfettered competition. What has emerged is a hybridized version of a free market. ­

Free market pros and cons – Should we privilege allocative efficiency and accept the resulting inequality?

Source: This image was created for If you want to use it you simply need to attribute it by linking to this page or to . Thanks

In a free market there are converging and diverging forces which may increase or reduce economic inequality. We discuss the pros and cons of free market economy and whether allocative efficiency justifies growing inequality.

Sir Charles Bean is Professor of Economics and member of the Office for Budget Responsibility. Before joining the Department of Economics at the LSE, he was Deputy Governor of the Bank of England. Charles Bean is an expert in monetary policy and macroeconomics.

Should we privilege allocative efficiency and accept the resulting inequality?

Market prices play an important role in signalling scarcity and providing people and businesses with the right incentives. Voluntary exchanges undertaken in competitive markets may produce efficient outcomes in terms of allocation of resources. Free markets may nevertheless sometimes result in unsatisfactory outcomes too. Income inequality is one of these side effects pointed at by some economists. Government intervention in the market may therefore be justified if we seek to reduce inequality or address other problems associated with free markets. Interventions that work with the grain of markets rather than against them is a current practice in most market economies. Managing this trade-off between promoting market efficiency and curbing income inequality has become one of the most important conundrums for policy-makers and economists in the 21st century.

Economists are sometimes divided into two camps. On the one hand, those who follow the ideas of Friedrich Hayek and Milton Friedman, defending the free market and opposing government intervention. On other hand, there are economists, like John Maynard Keynes, who emphasize the role of governments and regulation and warn us of some of the problems associated with complete free market capitalism.

Allocative efficiency

Allocative efficiency is an economic term which refers to the optimal distribution of goods and services, once consumer preferences are taken into consideration. Market efficiency theory predicts that in perfectly competitive markets, a price equilibrium is reached when the the marginal cost of producing a good or service is equal to the marginal benefit consumers receive from them. Market efficiency is one of the main arguments in defence of unleashing markets. Free competition and voluntary adjustment of prices are requisites for achieving allocative and productive efficiency in a market. This is one of the reasons why economists tend to criticize government regulation of prices.

Prices set the terms of trade for exchange and play three major functions:

  • Transmit information about the value to the buyer (demand) and the cost to the seller (supply).
  • Provide an incentive to substitute from high-price goods to similar low-price goods and from activities with a low return to activities with a high return (i.e. to act on the information about demand/supply).
  • Determine the distribution of income and so provide appropriate incentives for the acquisition of suitable skills and the accumulation of capital.

Overall, a competitive market economy produces an efficient outcome, in the sense that nobody can be made better off without making someone else worse off (“Pareto efficiency”). The efficient market hypothesis formalizes Adam Smith’s metaphor of an “invisible hand” that leads self-interested individual behaviour to result in socially beneficial outcomes.

Inequality and the forces of divergence

Neo-classical economists have traditionally defended the idea of convergence in free markets. This notion of convergence refers to a catch-up effect which makes poorer economies grow at a faster pace than richer countries due to difussion of knowledge and skills and the lower cost of production. However, convergence theory is becoming increasingly criticized. Free market is considered by many economists as one of the major causes of income inequality and economic disparity. Moses Abramovitz argues that developing countries need “social capabilities” in order to activate this catch-up mechanism and take advantage of their lower production costs and the technological advances introduced by richer countries. Robert Lucas showed that capital does not always flow from developed to developing countries (“Lucas Paradox”).

The French economist, Thomas Piketty argues that the diffusion of knowledge and skills is the key to productivity growth and to inequality reduction. The forces of convergence, such as the law of supply and demand and the mobility of labor and capital, are not strong enough to compensate the effect of the forces of divergence which are pushing toward greater inequality. Under “market efficiency” conditions, top earners can quickly separate themselves in terms of income and wealth. For instance, top executives have the capacity to set their own salaries. Moreover, inequality increases because often the return on capital is higher than rate of economic growth (r >g). Private wealth derived from real estate, financial assess and professional capital has grown steadily since the 1950s. Wealth puts people, and countries, in a situation of structural advantage compared to others. The wealth and income gap increases. Finally, the forces of convergence, are not completely spontaneous. For instance government intervention is key to the the education policies necessary for the diffusion of knowledge.

Do you think governments should intervene to make sure that these forces of divergence are controlled? Should they rather abstain to facilitate market efficiency? Is “inequality a necessary evil”?

Watch Prof. Thomas Piketty’s lecture at the LSE as well as the discussion on whether markets are efficient between Prof. Eugene Fama and Prof. Richard Thaler (Chicago Booth)

Free market pros and cons

Critics and advocates of market liberalization have produced many arguments for and against “free market.” These are some of the most commonly cited advantages and disadvantages:

Free market pros

  • A competitive free market economy produces an efficient outcome. The allocation of resources and productive capacities are optimized.
  • Free markets have historically contributed to an increase in trade and economic growth, and to the emergence of liberal democracies.
  • Globalization, which to a great extent was driven by free market ideals, has also helped to multiply and enrich cultural and social exchanges.
  • Free markets drive investment and innovation. Investment and innovation are inherently uncertain; free markets offer incentives to companies to undertake risks.
  • Similarly, free market leads to diversity and experimentation.
  • Free market facilitates productive entrepreneurial behavior.
  • Governments often lack the sufficient knowledge or resources to steer the complex machine of the economy in its entirety. Sometimes government intervention fails. Therefore, market “self-regulation” is usually more effective.
  • Governments can be corrupt or subject to special interest (rent-seeking behavior and government capture).

Cons of free market

  • In free markets, there are forces of divergence that contribute to income and wealth inequality.
  • Markets need to be supported by rules and institutions which only government can guarantee. For instance, governments secure property rights, enforce contracts and supply money.
  • Externalities. Individuals may ignore the impact of their actions on others, either positive or negative externalities.
  • The insufficient allocation of public goods (e.g. defence, health, education) due to their non excludable nature and free-riding is another limitation of free market theory.
  • Market power may be abused. There are many examples of monopolistic and cartelistic behavior of companies disrupting allocative and productive efficiency, as well as generating a welfare loss.
  • Economic crises are often amplified by the lack proper regulation. They provide evidence of market malfunctioning.
  • Competitive markets and globalization produce both winners and losers. For instance we have witnessed a booming global elite while middle-classes were in decline.
  • The perceived failure of free market economies is one of the reasons for the emergence of populist and xenophobic leaders in many countries.

Recommended readings

  • Friedman,M. and Friedman,R.D (1980), “Chapter 1 The Power of the Market,” in Free To Choose: A Personal Statement. New York: Harcourt
  • Irwin, D.A. (2020), Free Trade Under Fire. Princeton University Press
  • Piketty, T. (2020), Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, Massachusetts : The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Rodrik, D. (2020) ‘Economics Rules: the rights and wrongs of the dismal science’. LSE Podcast, 7 October 2020. Listen to minutes 3-30. Full Audio available online

If you want to promote your own scholarly debate, lecture, research project or academic article, contact us: university[a]

Vote to see result and collect 1 XP. Your vote is anonymous.
If you change your mind, you can change your vote simply by clicking on another option.

Best Binary Options Brokers 2020:

    Top Broker!
    Best Choice For Beginners!
    Free Trading Education!
    Free Demo Account!
    Big Sign-up Bonus!


    Perfect For Experienced Traders!

Like this post? Please share to your friends:
How To Choose Binary Options Broker 2020
Leave a Reply

;-) :| :x :twisted: :smile: :shock: :sad: :roll: :razz: :oops: :o :mrgreen: :lol: :idea: :grin: :evil: :cry: :cool: :arrow: :???: :?: :!: